It was a long hot summer, and there was not a horror film in
sight—until The Possession appeared just before August ended. There was a drought on horror films all June, July, and nearly all of August of 2012. Many say that The Possession satisfied this unmet
demand, to the point that this otherwise unremarkable film led box office sales
for a few weeks.
The Possession revolves
around a young girl who finds a “dybbuk box”
at a yard sale. At her insistence, the girl’s divorced father buys the box,
unaware of its contents. The daughter opens the box and becomes possessed by
the disembodied spirit (“dybbuk”) that
is housed inside. She begins to behave bizarrely, stabbing herself and others
and wandering off, for no reason at all. Her parents’ divorce is implicated in
this sudden shift.
The parallel between the dybbuk
box and Pandora’s box is obvious, but this association is secondary to the
dybbuk’s deep roots in Jewish folkore, film, theatre, and mysticism. The theme
is a throw back S. Ansky’s play from 1914. The dybbuk story became a favorite of Yiddish stage and cinema, eventually
making its way into opera and puppetry. The last “official” Yiddish dybbuk film was made in Poland
in 1937, shortly before Nazis invaded Poland
and eventually exterminated most of Poland ’s
large Jewish population.
The Dybbuk (1937) |
Matisyahu stars as the young Chasidic man who rises to the
occasion to save the day—but loses his own life in the end (just as the
psychiatrist-priest dies as The Exorcist ends). Matisyahu is a neo-Chasidic rapper who holds heart
throb status for many young traditional Jews. He wins kudos for his heroic role
in exorcising the dybbuk from the
daughter—after an MRI scan reveals shadows
of a spirit inside her and after her father drives frantically to a Chasidic
enclave in Brooklyn to consult with rabbinical experts.
It’s easy to understand why traditional Jews would buy
tickets to see The Possession. But it took a
much wider audience to make this film a commercial success, in spite of its
cinematic shortcoming. I’m not convinced that the perseverance of hard-core
horror film fans fully explains its impressive sales, either. Producer Sam Rami has his followers, for sure, but not enough to blast the box office.
Perhaps the plot also reflects current controversy about
psychiatric treatments for young children. ADHD diagnoses among children are no
longer news—but the increasing use of strong, and often unapproved,
antipsychotic meds in pediatric patients has made the front pages in the last
few years. I’m theorizing that this film about the bizarre behavior of a little
girl—and the equally bizarre explanation for its sudden onset—may represent a
hidden critique of child psychiatry, and the willingness to assign serious
diagnoses to young children, and to prescribe multiple medications, before
conducting a full explanation for other sources of distress.
In this film, the parents’ acrimonious divorce, and its spillover on their children, could explain their daughter’s odd behavior. Instead, a dybbuk is discovered, and an exorcism is performed, and serious side effects (the loss of Matisyahu’s life) ensue.
In this film, the parents’ acrimonious divorce, and its spillover on their children, could explain their daughter’s odd behavior. Instead, a dybbuk is discovered, and an exorcism is performed, and serious side effects (the loss of Matisyahu’s life) ensue.
The Possession poster recollects the moths & mouth seen in the famed Silence of the Lambs poster. |
Perhaps, on some level, viewers took this message to heart, and bought tickets for a second-rate horror that has first-class parallels with contemporary controversies. It would not be surprising if some parents are as perplexed as the parents in The Possession, when their children behave strangely, and then receive even stranger diagnoses and more mysterious treatments. Updates to the APA's DSM-V (Diagnostic & Statistical Manual) will address these important issues.
To read more about the literary, filmic, and folkoric origins of The
Dybbuk (1937), please refer to Dr. Packer's Movies and the Modern
Psyche (Praeger, 2007).
To read about recent debates about psychiatry,
please see Cinema’s Sinister Psychiatrists (2012),
which references the summer 2011 issue of
NY Review of Books reviews and rebuttals.
To read about recent debates about psychiatry,
please see Cinema’s Sinister Psychiatrists (2012),
which references the summer 2011 issue of
NY Review of Books reviews and rebuttals.
No comments:
Post a Comment