Since Dr. Packer signed her contract for a book about “neuroscience fiction” film in 2011, trends in psychiatric practice have become more convoluted and complex. Psychiatric theory seems to be traveling down a winding country road, with twists and turns. It seems that psychiatry is no longer speeding down an express superhighway, where a single lane leads to one destination only (the brain). A new brand of anti-psychiatry activism has surfaced, but this time around, it has “establishment” origins, and arrived in full force via Dr. Marcia Angell’s articles in New York Review of Books (summer, 2011). Dr. Angell was the editor of the esteemed New England Journal of Medicine, and one of the most visible and admired women in American academic medicine. Vitriolic debates followed Angell’s comments. Fortunately for film fans, such controversies can beget even more intense cinematic depictions of minds and brains, as we shall see below.
When the 1990s became known as the “Decade of the Brain,” neuropsychiatry got serious. Psychopharmacology, neuroscience, and brain imaging pushed “armchair analysis” aside. Psychiatry moved closer to medicine. EBM (evidence-based medicine) demands proof for clinical assertions--yet our concerns are not always clinical. If we want to know how contemporary culture conceives of the mind—or of those who lose it or treat it--we can turn to the movies, to turn cinematic trends into diagnostic tools.
Sunday, October 21, 2012
MIND OVER MOVIES moves over . . .
Since Dr. Packer signed her contract for a book about “neuroscience fiction” film in 2011, trends in psychiatric practice have become more convoluted and complex. Psychiatric theory seems to be traveling down a winding country road, with twists and turns. It seems that psychiatry is no longer speeding down an express superhighway, where a single lane leads to one destination only (the brain). A new brand of anti-psychiatry activism has surfaced, but this time around, it has “establishment” origins, and arrived in full force via Dr. Marcia Angell’s articles in New York Review of Books (summer, 2011). Dr. Angell was the editor of the esteemed New England Journal of Medicine, and one of the most visible and admired women in American academic medicine. Vitriolic debates followed Angell’s comments. Fortunately for film fans, such controversies can beget even more intense cinematic depictions of minds and brains, as we shall see below.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment